Monday, September 21, 2009

Big Fan

Big Fan is not The Wrestler. (If you haven't seen The Wrestler yet, go rent it right now.) That's an odd way to start, perhaps, but worth noting. Both films, of course, were written by Robert Siegel, and Big Fan marks his directorial debut. But if you walk into this picture expecting the same emotional wallop of last year's tour de force, you will be disappointed.

That said, Big Fan is worth seeing. Its story follows Paul Aufiero, a parking garage attendant, who lives with his mother, and breathes only for the New York Football Giants. It's sad to watch him go about his day with such a singular but inconsequential obsession. And if his impotence weren't enough, we also see him endure pestering from concerned family members who, while clearly living the American dreams of some, lead perceptibly shallow lives themselves and offer nothing of interest to an inveterate Paul.

Things take a surly turn when Paul and his best friend spot their favorite Giants player — the cannily named Quantrell Bishop — and follow him to a night club where a misunderstanding lands Paul in the hospital for days. Qunatrell is suspended, and what follows is as unbelievable as it is utterly plausible. Don't be surprised if you find your jaw slackening as Paul scrapes toward the climax.

Patton Oswalt's performance delivers soundly, including some delightful disgust as Paul prepares for his decisive act. Where this character is lacking though, is in development. Big Fan offers more of a portrait than any kind of arc, and while this is obviously the film's purpose, it gives us nothing to root for; our hopes are dashed almost before they're formed. I wonder if this character could have struggled more with himself and still retained his essential single-mindedness. (Heck, Rain Man did.) As it is, he may be the spitting image of a die-hard writ extreme, but a more pronounced conflict might have furnished a more satisfying richness. Whereas Randy the Ram battles his demons a tragic hero, Paul from Staten Island is just tragic, no hero at all.

Friday, September 11, 2009

Tim Burton's Vincent



I'm clearly behind the curve on this (1982), but what a great film to start off a section for excellent shorts.

Sunday, August 23, 2009

Inglourious Basterds

Quentin Tarantino is a cocky son of a bitch.

Inglourious Basterds is better for it. Whatever conventions movie audiences have become accustomed to, Tarantino has no problem turning them on their heads, warping them to suit his needs, or simply abandoning them altogether; he uses any cinematic device he pleases, whenever he pleases, to fill his narrative with a richness of presentation that to my knowledge is unparalleled. The result is at times comic, at times darkly disturbing, and — impressively — oftentimes both. Tarantino's previous films are amalgamations in similar fashion, of course, but Inglourious Basterds does it better. The pervasive violence and eerily plausible dialogue we've come to expect are rolled into a scope and stylistic maturity that thoroughly transcend the cult classic. (And the violence here does not cross into indulgence, as it sometimes has tended to with Tarantino.) (Also, I in no way mean to denigrate cult classics; this is just a horse of a different color.)

As for the cast, Brad Pitt may put bodies in the seats, but the star of this film is Christoph Waltz. I have never felt tension build so steadily and so insidiously as when Colonel Hans Landa permeates a scene. (Tarantino's writing provides the fodder, yes, but man does Waltz sell it.) The international troupe, hailing from the U.S., Germany, Austria, France, brings things off masterfully, offering a superb authenticity to this irreverent, genre-bending tale.

With characteristic musical and cinematographic excellence, Inglourious Basterds is a masterpiece. Tarantino says so right there in the movie. Cocky? Absolutely. But rightfully so. He probably has just released this year's best picture.